sat-dog

← Back to browse

Medium Reading and Writing · Information and Ideas · None · MCQ

The author argues that the most effective way to combat climate change is to reduce the consumption of meat. He writes, "As long as humans continue to raise and slaughter animals for food, there will be no significant reduction in greenhouse gases." While the author may be correct to assert that animal agriculture is a significant contributor to greenhouse gases, this argument is flawed. The author seems to ignore other major sources of greenhouse gases, such as the burning of fossil fuels and industrial processes.

Which choice best describes the author's main criticism of the argument presented in the passage?

  1. A

    The author suggests that animal agriculture is not the only source of greenhouse gases.

  2. B

    The author argues that reducing greenhouse gases is not a realistic goal.

  3. C

    The author claims that the consumption of meat should be reduced.

  4. D

    The author suggests that the author of the passage is unfamiliar with the science of climate change.

Source: Reading and Writing practice questions from the OpenSAT community question bank, whose licence permits free use of the database. View the official question bank →

OpenSAT items are community-written or AI-generated practice material, not official College Board questions; quality varies.

id opensat:b24a3409d9d8c019d5edad917d22a682 · question random_id_e8 · JSON